An Environmental Impact and Cost Evaluation of Manufacturing System ― Application to a heat treatment system ―
Application to a heat treatment system
Abstract
Environmental benign manufacturing system has been pursued in manufacturing companies together with the reduction of manufacturing cost, which means the necessity of developing a simultaneous evaluation method of environmental and manufacturing cost. In general, environmental evaluation of the manufacturing system is difficult due to its complexity and peculiarity to each company. In this study, to cope with the problem, a hierarchically structured process flow in manufacturing system is introduced to visualize the manufacturing process. The process flow is composed of unit processes which stand for operations and the data necessary to the evaluation of environmental and cost are put into the lowest lever unit processes. Cost evaluation is carried out by the method of activity based costing. This method simultaneous evaluation of both environmental impact and manufacturing cost is applied to the evaluation of a heat treatment system. The system processes automotive machine parts with the use of either gas soft nitriding or gas carburizing method. In the case of gas soft nitriding the amount of CO2 emission, environmental impact defined by Eco-indicator 95, energy consumption and manufacturing cost per 1kg machine parts are 1.63kg, 5.50×10-3, 18.7MJ and 88.22 yen respectively. On the other hand, the corresponding values of gas carburizing are as follows: 0.655kg, 8.75×10-4, 7.7MJ, 55.36 yen. As the result, the method of gas carburizing is preferable from the viewpoint of environment and cost.
References
Yoshihiro Adachi, Taiya Matsuno, Ichiro Tsuji, and Hiroaki Higuchi, Ring System Engineering, University of Tokyo Press, 2004.
Ministry of the Environment, General Environment Policy Bureau, Environmental White Book, 2004.
Tetsuo Nakayama, “Life Cycle Aces in Japan Development of Smento Methods and Trends in International Standardization”, Journal of the Society of Nergy, Vol77, No10, 1998, PP.934-940.
LCA Introductory Editorial Committee, Introduction to LCA Practice, Industry Sakai Management Association, 1998.
Mark Cheap, "The Eco-indicator 95 Final Report”, PRe Consultants, 1996.
Bengt Steen,“EPS-Default Valuation of Environmental Impacts from Emission and Use of Resources Version 1996”,CPM, 1996.
Atsushi Terazono, “Life Cycle Assessment Impak Weighting of Environmental Impacts in Assessment Law”, Safety Engineering, Vol35, 1996, pp. 399-409.
Tokuhiro Ijima and Kaoru Inaba, Impact of Life Cycle Environment Evaluation LIME-LCA, Environmental Accounting, Review for Environmental Efficiency Methods and Databases, Industrial Management Association, 2005.
Takeo Yoshikawa, Japan-type ABC Management, Productivity Publishing, 1997.
Hiroyuki Ono, Torio Sano, Yasushi Nishizaki, Tsutomu Uda, Shuichiro Ono and Yutaka Shirai:, “Environmental Evaluation of Manufacturing Processes in the Assembly Industry - Use of CAD/CAM Data – ”, Journal of the Japan Society of Management Engineering, Vol. 59, No1, 2008, pp.68- 73.
LCA Japan Forum; http://www.jemai.or.jp/lcaforum/.
TEPCO; http://www.tepco.co.jp/eco/earth/jyourei/toukyo-j.html.