Analysis of International Interests and Emotional Responses to the Coronavirus Pandemic

  • Satoshi Fukuda Chuo University
  • Hidetsugu Nanba Chuo University
  • Hiroko Shoji Chuo University
Keywords: Twitter, Sentiment Analysis, COVID-19

Abstract

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in December 2019 is still exerting a global impact in 2022, with various media outlets reporting related news items on a daily basis. We analyzed the interest in, and emotional reactions to, COVID-19 of people around the world, as expressed on Twitter. As a measure of interest, we examined replies to news tweets posted by four news outlets (Yahoo! News, The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, and The Times of India), and classified the emotional content of each reply tweet using Plutchik’s wheel of emotion. The analysis suggested that negative sentiment prevailed worldwide between January 2020 and May 2022; fear-related tweets were significantly more common from January to February 2020 than in the other months in all news reports. However, anticipation-related tweets were more common than those in all other emotion categories in October–November 2021 in Japan. We also analyzed the factors that contributed to the rise of a particular emotion by tracing the news to which tweets with the emotion replied. Our approach that used the news and reply tweets was useful in approximating the factors of the emotional reactions of people in different countries to COVID-19.

References

R. Plutchik, “A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion,” Theories of Emotion, 1980, pp. 3–33.

T. de Melo and C. M. Figueiredo, “Comparing News Articles and Tweets about COVID-19 in Brazil: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Approach,” JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, vol. 7, no. 2, 2021.

P. Ghasiya and K. Okamura, “Investigating COVID-19 News across Four Nations: a Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis Approach,” Ieee Access, vol. 9, 2021, pp. 36645-36656.

D. Angelov, “Top2vec: Distributed Representations of Topics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09470, 2020.

Y. Liu, M. Ott, N. Goyal, J. Du, M. Joshi, D. Chen, O. Levy, M. Lewis, L. Zettlemoyer, and V. Stoyanov, “RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach,” arXiv:1907.11692, 2019.

K. K. Bhagat, S. Mishra, A. Dixit, and C. Y. Chang, “Public Opinions about Online Learning during COVID-19: a Sentiment Analysis Approach,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 6, 2021.

S. Lorla, TextBlob Documentation, 2020: https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/textblob/latest/textblob.pdf [accessed May. 30, 2022]

Y. Wang, M. Shi, and J. Zhang, “What Public Health Campaigns can Learn from People’s Twitter Reactions on Mask-Wearing and COVID-19 Vaccines: a Topic Modeling Ap-proach,” J. Cogent Social Sciences, vol.7, no.1, 2021.

D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, “Latent Dirichlet allocation,” J. Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, 2003, pp. 993–1022.

T. Hu, S. Wang, W. Luo, M. Zhang, X. Huang, Y. Yan, R. Liu, K. Ly, V. Kacker, B. She, and Z. Li, “Revealing Public Opinion Towards COVID-19 Vaccines with Twitter Data in the United States: A Spatiotemporal Perspective,” J. Med. Internet Res, vol. 23, no. 9, 2021.

S. Yousefinaghani, R. Dara, S. Mubareka, A. Papadopoulos, and S. Sharif, “An Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Sentiments and Opinions on Twitter,” Int. J. Infect. vol. 108, 2021, pp. 256–262.

C. J. Hutto and E. Gilbert, “VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text,” Proc. of ICWSM, 2014, pp. 216–225.

T. Kajiwara, C. Chu, N. Takemura, Y. Nakashima, and H. Nagahara, “WRIME: A New Dataset for Emotional Intensity Estimation with Subjective and Objective Annotations,” Proc. of NAACL-HLT, 2021, pp. 2095–2104.

S. Mohammad, F. Bravo-Marquez, M. Salameh, and S. Kiritchenko, “Semeval-2018 Task 1: Affect in Tweets,” Proc. of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic Eval-uation, 2018, pp. 1–17.

J. Devlin, M. -W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” Proc. of NAACL-HLT, 2019, pp. 4171–4186.

D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” Proc. of ICLR, 2015.

Published
2024-05-20
Section
Technical Papers (Data Science & Institutional Research)