The Redesigning Road Network in the Era of Decreasing Population by Traffic Simulation

  • Shun Higashikawa Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology
  • Shoko Abe Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology
  • Kazuhiko Iwase Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology
  • Tomoaki Takemura Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology
  • Jieshuo Zhang Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology
  • Tomoyuki Ohkubo Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology
  • Hisashi Hayashi Advanced Institute of Industrial Technology
Keywords: road network, cost-benefit analysis, congestion, traffic simulation

Abstract

In light of an aging society in which the number of expressway users declines while infrastructure maintenance costs remain high, we propose a new method for evaluating whether expressway routes should be closed when their cost-benefit ratios become unfavorable owing to reduced usage. Moreover, we conducted a case study in which this method was applied to analyze the Kawasaki route (Kanagawa No. 6, Kawasaki route, a metropolitan expressway in Japan). The analysis results projected the cost-benefit ratio of this route to fall below 1 by 2025 owing to the reduced number of users. However, closing the Kawasaki route would lead to significant congestion on its alternative route, National Route 409. Restoring the congestion rate of National Route 409 to its previous level requires its expansion to 10 lanes, making the closure of the Kawasaki route impractical.

References

Metropolitan Expressway Co., Ltd., “IR Report July 2020”, 2020.

S. Higashikawa, A. Shoko, I. Kazuhiko, T. Tomoaki, Z. Jieshuo, O. Tomoyuki, and H. Hayashi, "Towards Sustainable Road Network in the Era of Shrinking Population: Case Study Using MATSim", 12th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, pp. 535-539, 2022.

D. B. Lee, “Methods for evaluation of transportation projects in the USA, Transport Policy”, Transport Policy, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 41-50, 2000.

K. G. Willis, G. D. Garrod, and D. R. Harvey, “A review of cost–benefit analysis as applied to the evaluation of new road proposals in the U.K.”, Transportation Re-search Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 141-156, 1998.

Y. Hayashi and H. Morisugi, “International comparison of background concept and methodology of transportation project appraisal”, Transport Policy, vol. 7, No. 1, pp.73-88, 2000.

S. Damart and B. Roy, “The uses of cost–benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France”, Transport Policy, vol. 16, No. 4, 2009.

S. Chi and J. Bunker, “An Australian perspective on real-life cost-benefit analysis and assessment frameworks for transport infrastructure investments”, Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 88, 2021.

E. D. A. A. Amjad, “Cost Benefit Analysis for Construction Projects. Petrokenya Industrial City Jubai Saudi Arabia”, IEP-SAC Journal 2004-2005, pp. 85-90, 2005.

D. Pearce, “Cost benefit analysis and environmental policy”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 14, No. 4 , pp. 84–100, 1998.

S. Manzo and K. B. Salling, “Integrating Life-cycle Assessment into Transport Cost-benefit Analysis”, Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 14, pp. 273-282, 2016.

J. D. Harford, “Congestion, pollution, and benefit-to-cost ratios of US public transit systems”, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 45-58, 2006.

J. Odeck and A. Kjerkreit, “The accuracy of benefit-cost analyses (BCAs) in transportation: An ex-post evaluation of road projects”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol.120, pp.277-294, 2019.

A. E. Boardman, W. L. Mallery, and A. R. Vining, “Learning from ex ante/ex post cost-benefit comparisons: the Coquihalla highway example”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 69-84, 1994.

C. Kelly, J. Laird, S. Costantini, P. Richards, J. Carbajo, and J. Nellthorp, “Ex post appraisal: What lessons can be learnt from EU cohesion funded transport projects?”, Transport Policy, vol. 37, pp. 83-91, 2015.

C. Chen, Z. Jia, and P. Varaiya, “Causes and cures of highway congestion”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 26-32, 2001.

P. Varaiya, “Reducing Highway Congestion: An Empirical Approach", European Journal of Control, vol. 11, No. 4–5, pp. 301-309, 2005.

C. F. Daganzo, “Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modeling and mitigation ap-proaches”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 49-62, 2007.

N. Geroliminis and C. F. Daganzo, “Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fun-damental diagrams: Some experimental findings”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 759-770, 2008.

A. Loder, L. Ambühl, M. Menendez, and K. W. Axhausen, “Understanding traffic capacity of urban networks”, Scientific Reports, vol. 9, 2019.

C. Buisson and C. Ladier, “Exploring the impact of homogeneity of traffic meas-urements on the existence of macroscopic fundamental diagrams”, Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2124, pp.127-136, 2009.

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, Road Bureau, City Bureau, “Cost-Benefit Analysis Manual (Draft) , (2008) , https://www.mlit.go.jp/road/ir/kihon/26/2-1_b.pdf, (accessed February 1st 2022).

Road Traffic Census 2005,

https://www.ktr.mlit.go.jp/road/shihon/road_shihon00000023.html (accessed Feb-ruary 1, 2022).

A. Horni, K. Nagel, and KW Axhausen, “The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim” , Ubiquity Press, London, 2016.

“Simunto Via User Manual”, Version 1.8, 2018.

Cabinet Office, Japan, “Annual Report on the Ageing Society”, 2021.

Metropolitan Expressway Co., Ltd., “Business evaluation”, https://www.shutoko.co.jp/company/enterprise/road/committee/ (accessed February 1, 2022).

Published
2024-10-28
Section
Practical Papers