Simulation Modeling of a Conceptual Model for Supply Chain Risks in Japan’s Automobile Industry

Authors

  • Toko Sasaki Niigata University of International and Information Studies
  • Akira Nagamatsu Tohoku University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52731/lbds.v004.213

Keywords:

Disruption, Supply Chain, Simulation Model, Automobile Industry

Abstract

Japan’s automobile industry suffered enormous losses because of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Four years earlier, the 2007 Niigata Chuetsu offshore earthquake had damaged Riken’s Kashiwazaki plant in Niigata, impeding operations among most Japan’s automobile manufacturers. Five years after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, many plants, including semiconductor manufacturer Renesas and automotive parts supplier Aisin Kyushu in Kumamoto were affected by the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, the impact affected entire Japan’s automobile industry. Thus, production stoppages at lower-tier suppliers have often affected nearly every Japan’s automobile manufacturer.

Therefore, the purposes of this study are to describe how disasters affected the supply chain network in Japan’s automobile industry, to build a conceptual model that reproduces concentration and consolidation within the supply chain structure, and to compare the propagation of the supply chain disruption using several models.

References

C.S. Tang, “Perspectives in supply chain risk management,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 103, Issue 2, 2006, pp.451-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006

P. Kraljic, “Purchasing Must Become Supply Management,” Harvard Business Review, No.883509, 1983, pp.109-117.

M. Christopher and H. Peck, “Building the Resilient Supply Chain,” International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2004, pp. 1-13.https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275

S. Yossi and J. B. Rice, Jr., “A Supply Chain View of the Resilient Enterprise,” MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2005, pp. 41-48. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/a-supply-chain-view-of-the-resilient-enterprise/

S. M. Wagner and C. Bode, “An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnera-bility,” Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 12, Issue 6, 2006, pp.301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2007.01.004

W. Klibi and A. Martel, “Scenario-based Supply Chain Network risk modeling,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 223, Issue 3, 2012, pp. 644-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.027

U. Jüttner, “Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business require-ments from a practitioner perspective,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, 2005, pp. 120-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090510617385

A. Ghadge, S. Dani, M. Chester, and R. Kalawsky, “A systems approach for mod-elling supply chain risks,” Supply Chain Management, Vol. 18 No. 5, 2013, pp. 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2012-0366

S.S. Kumar and A. Bhat, “Supply chain risk management dimensions in Indian automobile industry: A cluster analysis approach,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 21 No. 6, 2014, pp. 1023-1040. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2013-0023

V. V. Shenoi, T. N. S. Dath, C. Rajendran, and P. Shahabudeen, “Strategic action grids: a study on supply chain risk management in manufacturing industries in In-dia,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 25 No. 8, 2018, pp. 3045-3061. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2017-0321

M. O. Gani, Y. Takahashi, S. Bag, and M. S. Rahman, (2022), “Firms’ dynamic capabilities and supply chain risk management: a B2B perspective,” Benchmarking: An International Journal,2022, https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2022-0457

C. L. Ahmadsian and J. R. Lincoln, “keiretsu, Governance, and Learning: Case Studies in Change from the Japanese Automotive Industry,” Institute of Industrial Relations University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper, No.76, 2000. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3086041

K. Shimokawa, The Japanese Automobile Industry, Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd., 1994.

T. Fujimoto. “Supply Chain Competitiveness and Robustness: A Lesson from the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Supply Chain “Virtual Dualization”, “Manufacturing Management Research Center Discussion Paper Series, No. 362, 2011. http://merc.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/mmrc/dp/pdf/MMRC362_2011.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-02-05