A Novel Balanced Reporting Innovation with Data Governance Evolution (BRIDGE) Method
An Eduinformatics Integrationof Creativity, Abduction and Organizational Knowledge Acceptance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52731/lbds.v005.352Keywords:
Creativity, Eduinformatics, Abduction, KnowledgeAbstract
The era of Society 5.0 demands both creativity and systematic knowledge implementation in organizational settings. However, there exists a significant gap between understanding new knowledge and its practical application. This paper proposes the Balanced Reporting Innovation with Data Governance Evolution (BRIDGE) method as a novel approach to facilitate the transition from intellectual understanding to unconscious competence in implementing new knowledge. Through the lens of Eduinformatics, we demonstrate how the BRIDGE method effectively integrates abductive reasoning for innovation while ensuring organizational acceptance. Using a case study from institutional research practices, we show how the method provides a structured transition period where traditional and innovative approaches coexist, enabling organizations to maintain operational continuity while implementing new methodologies. The BRIDGE method addresses the fundamental challenge of knowledge acceptance by acknowledging that while creativity and abduction are essential for generating new knowledge, successful implementation requires careful consideration of organizational dynamics. Our findings suggest that this method can be adapted for various organizational contexts where new knowledge needs to be effectively implemented and accepted, providing a practical framework for bridging the gap between innovation and adoption.
References
E. Carayannis and J. Alexander, Global and local knowledge: Glocal transatlantic public-private partnerships for research and technological development. Springer, 2006.
O. Onday, “Japan’s society 5.0: going beyond industry 4.0,” Business and Economics Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.4172/2151-6219.1000389.
M. Fukuyama, “Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society,” Japan Spotlight, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 47–50, 2018.
I. Conference, “ICICT2023,” 2023. https://icict.co.uk/contact.php
Cabinet Office in Japan, “Society 5.0.” 2016. Accessed: Oct. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html
X. Ge, D. Ifenthaler, and J. M. Spector, Emerging technologies for STEAM education: Full STEAM ahead. Springer, 2015.
R. W. Bybee, “What is STEM education?,” Science, vol. 329, no. 5995. American Association for the Advancement of Science, p. 996, 2010. doi: 10.1126/science.119499.
D. Aguilera and J. Ortiz-Revilla, “STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review,” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 331, 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11070331.
Oecd, “About Technical Competencies in competency framework.” http://www.oecd.org/careers/competency_framework_en.pdf
K. Takamatsu, K. Murakami, T. Kirimura, K. Bannaka, I. Noda, L. R.-J. Wei, K. Mitsunari, M. Seki, E. Matsumoto, M. Bohgaki, A. Imanishi, M. Omori, R. Adachi, M. Yamasaki, H. Sakamoto, K. Takao, J. Asahi, T. Nakamura, et al., “‘Eduinformatics’: A new education field promotion,” Bulletin of kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 11, pp. 27–44, 2018, doi: 10.20608/00000958.
K. Takamatsu, Y. Kozaki, K. Murakami, A. Sugiura, K. Bannaka, K. Mitsunari, M. Omori, and Y. Nakata, “Review of Recent Eduinformatics Research,” in 2019 IIAI International Congress on Applied Information Technology (IIAI-AIT), 2019, p. submitted.
T. Kirimura, K. Takamatsu, K. Bannaka, I. Noda, M. Omori, R. Adachi, K. Mitsunari, and Y. Nakata, “Three-step knowledge network model,” Bulletin of Kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 9, pp. 78–86, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1050845762577181568
K. Takamatsu, K. Bannaka, T. Kirimura, I. Noda, K. Murakami, K. Mitsunari, and Y. Nakata, “Tag-based knowledge network models,” Bulletin of Kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 10, pp. 51–60, 2017.
Y. Nakata, K. Bannaka, T. Kunisaki, T. Kirimura, and K. Takamatsu, “Data-driven approach essential for mathematical and data science education in basic nursing education: to avoid a belief conflict between methodologies,” Bulletin of Kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 15, pp. 12–19, 2022, doi: 10.20608/00001150.
K. Takamatsu, I. Noda, K. Bannaka, K. Murakami, T. Kirimura, T. Kunisaki, R. Kozaki, S. Matsumoto, A. Kishida, H. Ito, A. Ito, S. Imai, K. Mitsunari, M. Omori, M. Mori, and Y. Nakata, “Abduction, Abstract Degree and Urgency Matrix (ABDU-M) for Flexible/Agile Higher Education Reform based on Eduinformatics,” in Intelligent Sustainable Systems Selected Papers of WorldS4 2023, 2024, p. in press.
D. L. Kirkpatrick and J. D. Kirkpatrick, Evaluating training programs: The four levels: The four levels, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler, 2006. [Online]. Available:
