Relating Academic Fields and Career Paths after College Education in Japan: Through Data Visualization with 2019 Survey Results

  • Nozomi Yoshida University of the ryukyus
  • Rie Mori National Institution for Academic Degrees and Quality Enhancement of Higher Education
Keywords: nomenclature of major fields of academic degrees, major academic fields, career-path selection, education-career relationship, visualization

Abstract

Since the deregulation of Standards for the Establishment of Universities in 1991 in Japan, diversification of faculty/department names has accelerated. The diversification made it difficult for college outsiders to correlate faculty/department names and academic fields, which might be one of the factors that hindered the college selections with perception of further career paths for university prospective students and career advisors in high schools. This study aims to find the efficient way in informing pre-higher education students of possible career-path selection after college education. In this study, we try to (A) visualize the characteristic of learning contents in each academic field using the name of major fields as a surrogate index for learning contents, and (B) examine the relationship between academic fields and career paths after college education. As a result, it shows (A) the characteristic of learning contents of academic fields by a morphological analysis and correspondence analysis on the name of major fields of academic degrees. In addition, it is revealed that (B) studying a specialized area of profession has been related to employment in a specific occupation and industry, while studying an interdisciplinary major has been related to employment in a wide variety of occupations. These results suggest the value of information provision on academic fields to be considered in the process of college selection.

References

N. Takahashi, and R. Mori, “Relationship between academic fields and career paths after college graduation in Japan,” Proc. 2020 9th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 2020, pp. 838-839.

Science Council of Japan Committee for university education’s quality assurance initiatives by field, “Review for future vision on nomenclature of major disciplines in Japan,” Report on discussions, September 2014. (in Japanese)

DISCO Inc., “Survey on university entrance and employment ,” Careertas Research, pp. 1-12, Mar. 2018. (in Japanese); https://www.disc.co.jp/press_release/5768/ (accessed 12 Dec. 2020).

Recruit, “Survey on high school career guidance and career education,” Recruit Marketi ng Partners Co., Ltd., Jan. 2017. (in Japanese); http://souken.shingakunet.com/research/2010/07/post-5cb6.html (accessed 12 Dec. 2020).

College Board, Big Future; https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/(accessed 06 Apr. 2021).

Carleton Career Center, Carleton College Career Paths; https://apps.carleton.edu/career/visualize/(accessed 06 Apr. 2021).

V. Di Stasio, and H.G.vande Werfhorst, “Why Does Education Matter to Employers in Different Institutional Contexts? A Vignette Study in England and the Netherlands” Social Forces, 95 (1): pp. 77-106, 2016.

L. Ortiz, and J. Rodriguez-Menés, “The Positional Value of Education and its Effect on General and Technical Fields of Education: Educational Expansion and Occupational Returns to Education in Spain” European Sociological Review, 32(2): pp. 216-37, 2016.

T. Kawashima, “The Changing Labor Market and Reform of University Education” The Japanese journal of labour studies, vol. 54(12), pp. 19-30, 2012. (in Japanese)

M. Suzuki, “Diversity and variation of the institiutions for training dietitians and registrered dietitians” Annual Bulletin, Graduate School of Education, Tohoku University, vol 58 (1), pp. 33-56, 2009. (in Japanese)

M. Kaneko, “Challenges to Academic Degree System in the Mobile and Knowledge-Centered Society,” The Journal on Academic Degrees of National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation: Research in Academic Degrees, no. 17, pp. 5-23, 2003. (in Japanese)

N. Takahashi, and R. Mori, “The Diversification of Nomenclature of Academic Degrees in Japanese Higher Education: Current State and Transition as found by 2015 National Survey,” RCUS, University of Tsukuba: University Studies, vol. 45, pp. 3-15, 2018. (in Japanese)

Y. Hamanaka, “Excessive variegation of nomenclature of major disciplines in academic degrees,” IDE: The Contemporary Higher Education, vol. 473, pp. 62-68, 2005. (in Japanese)

R. Mori, “Excessive variegation of nomenclature of major disciplines in academic degrees -Current state of Japan and U.S.,” Handout of the 1st review meeting for the role of nomenclature of major disciplines, December 2010. (in Japanese).

National Institution for Academic Degrees and Quality Enhancement of Higher Education, “The 2019 National Survey for the nomenclature of major fields,” Nov. 2020 (in Japanese); https://www.niad.ac.jp/publication/gakui/meishou.html (accessed 12 Dec. 2020).

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, “The FY2019 School Basic Survey,” Dec. 2019 (in Japanese); https://www.e-stat.go.jp/ (accessed 12 Dec. 2020).

K. Higuchi, “Quantitative Text Analysis for Social Research: Toward Succession and Development of Content Analysis,” Nakanishiya-shuppan, Inc., 2014. (in Japanese)

N. Ohsumi, “Correspondence analysis method / quantification method type III concept”, 2005. (in Japanese); http://www.ai.u-hyogo.ac.jp/~arima/ca.pdf (accessed 12 Dec. 2020).

Published
2021-07-31
Section
Technical Papers