A Mathematical Theory to Evaluate Disruptive Changes Deductively

  • Daisuke Ikeda Kyushu University
  • Kun Qian Kyushu University
  • Kengo Nawata Fukuoka University
Keywords: Deductive Approach, Fruitful, Mathematical Theory, Dual Process Theory, Information Dissemination

Abstract

Digital transformation, known as DX, is gaining a lot of attention in a variety of organizations, and higher education institutions are experiencing such rapid changes. IR sections in them, therefore, have to support and evaluate their trials for such rapid changes. Although a popular approach to evaluating trials is to use data about them, in the case of trials aiming for disruptive changes, it is important to evaluate them beforehand since such a trial can be too costly and its impact can be serious damage to institutions. However, it is intrinsically difficult to deal with such changes since we need not have enough data beforehand. This paper is devoted to developing a framework, which can be used to evaluate such disruptive changes. The main idea for the framework is that our daily behaviors are defined as a theory from the perspective of information dissemination. Using the proposed framework, we derive some findings deductively, which are not obvious from existing approaches. Thus we can conclude that the proposed framework is fruitful. These findings include that in- formation dissemination is derived to create disruptive changes, although our basic notions do not include being disruptive. We can also show that dissemination can cause a succes- sive cascade and the proposed model can explain the reason why resistance to new changes occurs. These findings can not be obtained from existing defitions for disruptive changes, such as DX. The main contribution of this paper is to show a deductive approach, which is not popular in IR, is effective in evaluating such disruptive changes.

References

D. Ikeda, K. Qian, and K. Nawata. A Theoretical Framework for Disruptive Changes Based on Information Dissemination. In IIAI Letters on Institutional Research, vol- ume 3, 2023.

K. Takamatsu, I. Noda, K. Bannaka, K. Murakami, Y. Kozaki, A. Kishida, et al. Sustainability of Digital Transformation (DX), Institutional Research (IR), and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Higher Education Based on Eduinformatics. In Intelligent Sustainable Systems, pages 565–572, 2023.

E. Stolterman and A. C. Fors. Information Technology and the Good Life, pages 687– 692. Springer US, Boston, MA, 2004.

G. Vial. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2):118–144, 2019. SI: Review issue.

C. M. Christensen. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, 1997.

J. L. Saupe. The Functions of Institutional Research. The Association for Institutional Research, 2nd edition edition, 1990.

D. Kahneman. Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin, 2012.

S. Arikawa, T. Shinohara, and A. Yamamoto. Learning elementary formal systems.

Theoretical Computer Science, 95:97–113, 1992.

D. Ikeda and H. Arimura. On the Complexity of Languages Definable by Hereditary Elementary Formal Systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Developments in Language Theory, pages 223–235, July 1997.

W. Isaacson. Steve Jobs. Simon & Schuster, 2011.

G. Wolf. Steve Jobs: The Next Insanely Great Thing. Wired, Feb. 1996.

J. Tappenden. Extending Knowledge and ‘Fruitful Concepts’: Fregean Themes in the Foundations of Mathematics. Nous, 29(4), 1995.

M. Weber. Economy and Society: an Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press, 1978. Translation of Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, based on the 4th German ed.

R. M. Stogdill. Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research. Free Press, 1974.

B. M. Bass and R. Bass. The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. Free Press, 2008.

S. Moscovici, E. Lage, and M. S. Naffrechoux. Influence of a Consistent Minority on the Responses of a Majority in a Color Perception Task. Sociometry, 32(4):365–380, 1969.

D. Centola, R. Willer, and M. W. Macy. The Emperor’s Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self-Enforcing Norms. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 2005.

Published
2025-03-24
Section
Theory Papers