Effects of Preparation to Enhance Japanese University Students’ Participation in ELF Dyadic Discussions
Abstract
The recent trend of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) research expects second language learners to actively participate in conversations as global citizens. In this so-called ecological CALL environment, it is common to use English as Lingua Franca (ELF), but because the participants have different levels of language proficiency, it can be difficult for less proficient learners to fully participate in the conversation. A similar problem is pointed out in the field of English Medium Instruction (EMI). Willingness to Communicate (WTC) is a concept that can affect learners’ participation in ELF conversations. This research focuses on state WTC and evaluates whether considering the topic content in their native language (i.e., Japanese) before ELF dyadic discussions results in increased utterances by local students. An experiment was conducted with 20 participants from a university in Japan, each of whom was paired with an international student. Participants were divided into two groups: the experimental group focused on the content of the topic in Japanese, while the control group studied English phrases and vocabulary before discussions. A subsequent t-test, calculation of effect size, and analysis of the participants’ use of communication strategies implied that focusing on topic content in Japanese was to some extent, more effective.
References
D.M. Chun, “The role of technology in SLA research,” Language Learning & Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, 2016, pp. 98-115.
M. Warschauer, “Technological change and the future of CALL,” S. Fotos and C. Brown, eds, New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms, Routledge, 2004, pp. 27-38.
C.A. Hafner, A. Chik, and R.H. Jones, “Digital literacies and language learning,” Language Learning & Technology, vol. 19, no.3, 2015, pp. 1-7.
D. Zheng, M.F. Young, R.A. Brewer, and M. Wagner, “Attitude and self-efficacy change: English language learning in virtual worlds,” CALICO journal, vol. 28, no. 1, 2009, pp. 205-231.
J. Vinther, “Enhancing motivation with cultural narratives in computer-mediated communication,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 24, no. 4, 2011, pp. 337-352.
J.J. Chen and S.C. Yang, “Promoting cross-cultural understanding and language use in research-oriented Internet-mediated intercultural exchange,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 29, no. 2, 2016, pp. 262-288.
Z. Dörnyei, “Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications,” Language learning, vol. 53, no. suppl. 1, 2003, pp. 3-32.
H. Reinders and S. Wattana, “Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning,” ReCALL, vol. 27, no. 1, 2015, pp. 38-57.
N. Chotipaktanasook, “Using social media in the EFL classroom for the enhancement of low affective filter and willingness to communicate,” Proceedings of CLaSIC, 2016, pp. 56-64.
K. Nakaya and M. Murota, “Development and Evaluation of an Interactive English Conversation Learning System with a Mobile Device Using Topics Based on the Life of the Learner,” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 8, no. 1, 2013, pp. 65-89.
E. Ayedoun, Y. Hayashi, and K. Seta, “Web-services Based Conversational Agent to Encourage Willingness to Communicate in the EFL Context,” The Journal of Information and Systems in Education, vol. 15, no. 1, 2016, pp. 15-27.
H. Rose and J. McKinley, “Japan’s English-medium instruction initiatives and the globalization of higher education,” Higher Education, vol. 75, no. 1, 2018, pp. 111-129.
J. Dearden, “English as a medium of instruction-a growing global phenomenon,” 2014; https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/pub_E484%20EMI%20-%20Cover%20option_3%20FINAL_Web.pdf.
S. Lin, “To speak or not to speak in the new Taiwanese university: class participation and identity construction in linguistically and culturally diverse graduate classrooms,” Language and intercultural communication, vol. 18, no, 2, 2018, pp.184-203.
J.C. McCroskey, “Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale,” Communication Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 1, 1992, pp. 16-25.
J.C. McCroskey and V. P. Richmond, “Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view,” Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, vol. 5, no. 2. 1990, pp. 19–37.
P.D. MacIntyre, R. Clément, Z. Dörnyei, and K.A. Noels, “Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation,” The Modern Language Journal, vol. 82, no. 4, 1998, pp. 545-562.
J.E. Peng and L. Woodrow, “Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context,” Language learning, vol. 60, no. 4, 2010, pp. 834-876.
J. Zhang, N. Beckmann, and J.F. Beckmann, “To talk or not to talk: A review of situational antecedents of willingness to communicate in the second language classroom,” System, vol. 72, 2018, pp. 226-239.
S. Amano, “Reducing Unwillingness to Speak English by Using Total Physical Response Activities in a Japanese University Context (Theoretical Studies and Experimental Studies, The 43rd CELES Conference in Toyama),” Journal of the Chubu English Language Education Society, vol. 43, 2014, pp. 153-160.
J. Fukuta, “Does the English Language Lesson with Communicative Tasks Reduce Unwillingness to Speak English? : A Practical Report,” LET Journal of Central Japan, vol. 26, 2015, pp. 85-94.
T. Isoda, “Reducing EFL Learners’ Unwillingness to Speak English,” JACET Journal, vol. 48, 2009, pp. 53-66.
Y. Cao, “Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective,” System, vol. 39, no. 4, 2011, pp. 468-479.
M. Eddy-U, “Motivation for participation or non-participation in group tasks: A dynamic systems model of task-situated willingness to communicate,” System, vol. 50, 2015, pp. 43-55.
S.J. Kang, “Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language,” System, vol. 33, no. 2, 2005, pp. 277-292.
Z.M. Khazaei, A.M. Zadeh, and S. Ketabi, “Willingness to Communicate in Iranian EFL Learners: The Effect of Class Size,” English Language Teaching, vol. 5, no. 11, 2012, pp. 181-187.
M. Yu, “An examination of the dynamic feature of WTC through dyadic group interaction,” System, vol. 55, 2015, pp.11-20.
L. Buckingham and R.S. Alpaslan, “Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice,” System, vol. 65, 2017, pp. 25-37.
M. Freiermuth and D. Jarrell, “Willingness to communicate: can online chat help?,” International journal of applied linguistics, vol. 16, no. 2, 2006, pp. 189-212.
M. Fujii and R. Nomura, Presentation in English: Ready to use expressions, Nikko Kikaku,
K. Hinata and M. Kano, 20 Unknown skills of English conversations, DHC, 2010.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, “Table comparing each qualification examination and CEFR,” 2018; https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/30/03/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/01/15/1402610_1.pdf.
Council of Europe, “Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume,” Council of Europe Publishing, 2020.
T. Yashima, “International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context,” Motivation, language identity and the L2 self, vol. 86, no. 1, 2009, pp. 144-163.
S. Ishihara and Y. Kinoshita, “Filler words as a speaker classification feature,” SST 2010, 2010, pp. 34-37.
T. Sadanobu, “Uttering Fillers in Conversation (Conversational Speech),” Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, vol. 14, no. 3, 2010, pp. 27-39.
Z. Dörnyei, “On the teachability of communication strategies,” TESOL quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, 1995, pp. 55-85.
A. Mizumoto and O. Takeuchi, “Basics and Considerations for Reporting Effect Sizes in Research Papers,” Studies in English Language Teaching, vol. 31, 2008, pp. 57-66.
M. Canale and M. Swain, “Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing,” Applied linguistics, vol. 1, no, 1, 1980, pp. 1-47.
C. Færch and G. Kasper, “Two ways of defining communication strategies,” Language learning, vol. 34, no. 1, 1984, pp. 45-63.
Y. Fang, “Lexical Problem-Solving Communication Strategies Employed by Chinese Japanese Learners,” Studies in Japanese Language and Japanese Language Teaching, vol. 3, 2012, pp. 127-143.
J. Mehring, “Present Research on the Flipped Classroom and Potential Tools for the EFL Classroom,” Computers in the Schools, vol. 3, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1-10.
J.S.C. Hsieh, W.C.V. Wu and M.W. Marek, “Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 30, nos. 1-2, 2017, pp. 1-21.
