Investigating the Impact of an English Meeting Transcription Tool on Student Speaking Skills and Confidence in EMI Contexts
Abstract
With globalization, English proficiency is crucial. Taiwan widely adopts English Medium Instruction (EMI) to prepare students for the global job market. However, many learners struggle with spoken English. This study utilizes an English meeting transcription tool to help students identify and improve their speaking skills, such as pronunciation, grammar, and fluency. By providing visual feedback, the tool encourages self-directed learning and reduces speaking anxiety. The study integrated this tool with the jigsaw cooperative learning method, promoting cooperative learning and active participation. Results from eight students showed improved idea expression and reduced speaking anxiety, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach. The study also explored students' perceptions through questionnaires and interviews, focusing on their speaking confidence, past experiences, and the impact of the assistive tool. Students found the tool user-friendly and the activities engaging, leading to increased participation and motivation. The findings suggest that technology-enhanced learning environments positively impact speaking confidence and recommend the use of transcription tools in English courses.
References
[2] M. T. Apple, The Big Five personality traits and foreign language speaking confidence among Japanese EFL students. Temple University, 2011.
[3] M. Asadian, “The Effect of Phonetic Transcription of TV News on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Pronunciation Accuracy at Word Level,” Interna-tional Journal of Research in English Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61–71, 2022.
[4] P. E. Blosser, “Using Cooperative Learning in Science Education.,” 1993.
[5] J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, “Situated cognition and the culture of learning,” 1989, vol. 18, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 1989.
[6] R. Clément, “Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second language,” in Language, Elsevier, 1980, pp. 147–154.
[7] H. Evcim and Ö. F. İpek, “Effects of jigsaw II on academic achievement in English prep classes,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 70, pp. 1651–1659, 2013.
[8] R. M. Gillies, “Cooperative learning: Developments in research.,” International journal of educational psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2014.
[9] M. Hafizhah, L. D. Wahyuni, and Y. Lubis, “Learn English Pronountation And Phonetic Transcription With Elsa Speaking Application: A Student Per-ception,” Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 65–73, 2023.
[10] B. Irawan and M. A. Tampubolon, “USING PHONETIC TRANSCRIPTION TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’PRONUNCIATION SKILLS,” Edulingua: Jurnal Linguistiks Terapan dan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2020.
[11] J. M. Keller, “Motivational design of instruction,” Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, vol. 1, no. 1983, Art. no. 1983, 1983.
[12] J. M. Keller, “Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional de-sign,” Journal of instructional development, vol. 10, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 1987.
[13] J. W. Peirce, “PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python,” Journal of neuroscience methods, vol. 162, no. 1–2, Art. no. 1–2, 2007.
[14] I. S. Samad and A. Aminullah, “Applying ELSA Speak software in the pro-nunciation class: Students’ perception,” Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2019.
[15] A. Sholeh and U. Muhaji, “Pronunciation difficulties encountered by EFL students in Indonesia: sebuah studi kasus pada mahasiswa kelas integrated course semester 1 fkip Bahasa Inggris Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang,” Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2015.
[16] R. E. Slavin, “Cooperative learning,” Review of educational research, vol. 50, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 1980.
