An Prototype: Mobile based Fire Extinguisher Count Requirement System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52731/liir.v005.210Keywords:
Fire Extinguisher, SUS, Count, APARAbstract
It is possible to make an effort to meet active fire protection standards by having fire extinguishers available, which refer to the rules for the number of requirements and placement of fire extinguishers in each building. These rules can be found in the active fire protection standards document. Formulas are used in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration No. Per.04 / MEN / 1980 in order to determine how many fire extinguishers are required for a given location. Currently, the problem that occurs is that there are still many buildings that have not met active fire protection standards such as not matching the number of fire extinguisher needs and their placement in a building. Data collection is carried out with two approaches to qualitative and quantitative methods. It was found that the prototype of the system that was built can be understood by users very well, and that the level of usability has met good results based on the SUS method. These findings were based on the findings of tests that evaluated the system's effectiveness and efficiency. It is anticipated that this prototype system will contribute to efforts in active fire protection.
References
D. Leavell, Fire Science Core Curriculum. Oregon State University, 2017.
B. Kotzen, E. R. Galea, S. Mosco, Z. Wang, J. Ewer, and F. Jia, “Fire safety risks of external living walls and implications for regulatory guidance in England,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 139, p. 103816, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.103816.
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, “Persyaratan Teknis Sistem Proteksi Kebakaran pada Bangunan Gedung dan Lingkungan.” Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, 2008.
P. M. Aqeev, T. P. Sysoeva, A. A. Kukharev, P. M. Sobolev, and O. N. Yakhontova, “Experimental studies of the process of initiation and spread of the dangerous fire factors while burning of the tube stock in the tunnel,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1902, no. 1, p. 012047, May 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1902/1/012047.
M. Karemaker, G. A. ten Hoor, R. R. Hagen, C. H. M. van Schie, K. Boersma, and R. A. C. Ruiter, “Elderly about home fire safety: A qualitative study into home fire safety knowledge and behaviour,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 124, p. 103391, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103391.
D. P. Nolan, “Chapter 19 - Methods of Fire Suppression,” in Handbook of Fire and Explosion Protection Engineering Principles for Oil, Gas, Chemical, and Related Facilities (Fourth Edition), D. P. Nolan, Ed., Gulf Professional Publishing, 2019, pp. 341–382. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816002-2.00019-2.
J. Dalle, A. Yusuf, A. Rizani, A. Yusuf, and C. Phandurand, “A Prototype For Parents To Monitor The Children’s Use Of Gadgets Applying Systems Development Life Cycle-Prototype: A Case Of Indonesia,” International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, vol. 14, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 2022.
M. H. Alsulami, M. M. Khayyat, O. I. Aboulola, and M. S. Alsaqer, “Development of an Approach to Evaluate Website Effectiveness,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 23, Art. no. 23, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132313304.
D. Lakshmi and S. Mallika, “A Review on Web Application Testing and its Current Research Directions,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 7, p. 2132, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v7i4.pp2132-2141.
M. Mol et al., “Dimensionality of the system usability scale among professionals using internet-based interventions for depression: a confirmatory factor analysis,” BMC Psy-chiatry, vol. 20, p. 218, May 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02627-8.
P. Leonardo and J. Wiratama, “Empowering Efficiency: A Web-Based Inventory and Sales Information System for Drinking Water Distributors through Rapid Application Development,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, May 2023, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v5i2.498.
D. Derisma, “The Usability Analysis Online Learning Site for Supporting Computer programming Course Using System Usability Scale (SUS) in a University,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 14, no. 09, Art. no. 09, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i09.13123.
M. Ojebode and B. I. Akhigbe, “Users’ Satisfaction with Internet Service Performance-Based on User Log,” IPTEK The Journal for Technology and Science, vol. 31, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.12962/j20882033.v31i3.5236.
A. Kumar and S. Lata, “The System Quality and Customer Satisfaction with Website Quality as Mediator in Online Purchasing: A Developing Country Perspectives,” Journal of Operations and Strategic Planning, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7–26, Jun. 2021, doi:10.1177/2516600X21991945.
M. Schrepp, J. Kollmorgen, and J. Thomaschewski, “A Comparison of SUS, UMUX-LITE, and UEQ-S,” 2023, p. Vol. 18, Issue 2, February 2023 pp. 86-104.
S. B. Harper and S. L. Dorton, “A Pilot Study on Extending the SUS Survey: Early Results,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 447–451, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1071181321651162.
