The Prediction Modeling System for Monitoring Elementary Students’ Mathematics Progress in Online Curriculum-Based Measurement

Authors

  • Mengping Tsuei National Taipei University of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52731/liir.v006.369

Keywords:

Curriculum-based measurement, prediction modeling system, mathematics education, elementary students

Abstract

The curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a data-based individualization method that monitors students’ performance and improvement over time. The purposes of this research were to develop prediction models—including ordinary least squares linear regression (OLS), Gaussian Naive Bayes, Bayesian Networks, and Random Forest—within a web-based CBM system, and to investigate their effectiveness in predicting elementary students’ mathematics performance. A total of 92 fourth-grade students participated in the study. They used mobile devices to complete CBM probes over an eight-week period. Performance metrics were analyzed to evaluate the error rate between predicted and observed scores. Overall, the results showed that OLS and Bayesian-based models were effective in predicting elementary students’ mathematics performance. Moreover, the findings indicated that distinct growth patterns still existed across different classes.

References

S. Deno, “Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative,” Exceptional Children, vol. 52, 1985, pp. 219-232.

J. R. Jenkins and S. F. Lynn, “Curriculum-based measurement: The paradigm, his-tory, and legacy, ” A measure of success: The influence of curriculum-based meas-urement on education, C. A. Espin et al., eds, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 7-26.

L. S. Fuchs, “Special Focus section on curriculum based measurement: Program development,” Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 50, 2017, pp. 187-193.

C. A. Espin and S. Deno, “Conclusion: Oral reading fluency or reading aloud from text: An analysis through a unified view of construct validity,” The fluency con-struct: Curriculum-based measurement concepts and applications, K. D. Cummings et al., eds., 2016, Springer, pp. 365-384.

S. P. Ardoin, T. J. Christ, L. S. Morena, D. C. Cormier and D. A. Klingbeil, “A sys-tematic review and summarization of the recommendations and research sur-rounding curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 51, 2013, pp. 1-18.

T. J. Christ and C. D. Desjardins, “Curriculum-based measurement of reading: An evaluation of frequentist and bayesian methods to model progress monitoring data,” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, vol. 36, 2018, pp. 55-73.

N. Van Norman, R. Ethan and N. M. Peter, “The influence of trend estimation method on forecasting curriculum-based measurement of reading performance," Journal of school psychology, vol. 74, 2019, pp. 44-57.

M. Tsuei, “A web‐based curriculum‐based measurement system for class‐wide ongoing assessment,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 24, 2008, pp. 47-60.

M. Tsuei, “The mobile mathematics Curriculum-based measurement application for elementary students,” Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, Vol. 3, 2012, pp. 731 -736.

P. Asthana, Pallavi, et al., “Prediction of student’s performance with learning co-efficients using regression based machine learning models,” IEEE Access, vol. 11 2023, pp. 72732-72742.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-03