The Taxonomies Project
Coding as Botanical Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52731/liir.v006.391Keywords:
algorithmic botany, botanical art, Computational Thinking, STEAM, tangiblesAbstract
This paper presents Taxonomies, a STEAM project that can be placed on the intersection between art, science, and technology. In Taxonomies, art is taking the lead role, providing a goal for action, while sciences and computation provide a shared agenda and means for artistic creation. The project is a collaboration between the University of Southern Denmark, the Biotech Lab at Spinderihallerne and Rosborg Gymnasium, a Danish secondary school. During the past year a series of 3 workshops was designed, implemented, and run at Rosborg. Here we focus on the challenges, design solutions, and findings related to the third workshop, which aimed at introducing forms of creative, aesthetic coding suitable for art students with no prior experience and allowing them to explore algorithmic botany. Results include a general method to convert L-Systems to tangibles, an intuitive software simulator to create simple algorithmic plants; moreover, materials and methods developed worked well within the strict constraints of the project. A new edition of Taxonomies is being run in these months, and we are working on generalizing the workshop format to a reusable and shareable kit for other schools.
References
G. Anderson-Tempini, Drawing as a Way of Knowing in Art and Science, Intellect Books, 2017.
P. Prusinkiewicz, and A. Lindenmayer, The algorithmic beauty of plants, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
G. W. Flake, The computational beauty of nature: Computer explorations of fractals, chaos, complex systems, and adaptation, MIT press, 2000.
I. K. Namukasa, J. Hughes, & R. Scucuglia, “STEAM and critical making in teacher education,” In Handbook of cognitive mathematics, 2022, pp. 939-970. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
G. A. Boy, “From STEM to STEAM: toward a human-centred education, creativity & learning thinking,” Proc. of the 31st European conference on cognitive ergonomics, 2013, pp. 1-7.
S. Mejias, et al., “The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway,” Science Education, Vol. 105(2), 2021, pp. 209-231.
I. Neacșu, “On Contemporary Botanical Art,” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series IV: Philology & Cultural Studies. 2023;15(Suppl): pp. 25-34.
N. Chomski, “On certain formal properties of grammars,” Information and control, vol. 2, issue 2, 1959, pp. 137-167.
C. Solomon, et al., “History of logo,” Proc. of the ACM on Programming Languages 4 HOPL 2020, pp. 1-66.
D. Shiffman, The Nature of Code: Simulating Natural Systems with JavaScript, No Starch Press, 2024, pp. 427-435.
A. Valente and E. Marchetti, “Programming Turing Machines as a game for tech-nology sense-making,” Proc. 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Ad-vanced Learning Technologies, IEEE, pp. 428-430.
A. Valente, and E. Marchetti, “Playful Learning and shared Computational Thinking: the PaCoMa case study,” Proc. International Conference on Computers in Education - ICCE 2020, Vol. II, pp. 180-189. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
D. Kharel, “Visual ethnography, thick description and cultural representation,” Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, vol. 9, 2015, pp. 147-160.
P. Dourish, Reading and interpreting ethnography, Ways of Knowing in HCI, 2014, pp. 1-23. New York, NY: Springer New York.
