Clinical Reasoning and Decision Making through Knowledge Networks and Abduction
A Sustainable Framework based on Eduinformatics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52731/lbds.v005.353Keywords:
clinical reasoning, clinical decision making, knowledge networks, abductive reasoning, eduinformaticsAbstract
This study examines the integration of clinical decision making processes with knowledge networks and abductive reasoning in nursing practice, proposing a sustainable framework based on eduinformatics. While clinical reasoning traditionally relies on deductive and inductive approaches, the complexity of modern healthcare demands more sophisticated decision-making methodologies. Through analysis of clinical cases and reasoning patterns, we demonstrate how abductive reasoning complements traditional approaches, particularly in situations where complete information is unavailable. The knowledge network theory provides a structured framework for understanding how clinical knowledge is created, shared, and applied. By integrating these elements through eduinformatics, we develop a comprehensive approach that enhances clinical reasoning capabilities in nursing education and practice. This framework offers a systematic way to improve clinical decision-making while maintaining sustainability in increasingly complex healthcare environments.
References
Y. Nakata, K. Bannaka, T. Kunisaki, T. Kirimura, and K. Takamatsu, “Data-driven approach essential for mathematical and data science education in basic nursing education: to avoid a belief conflict between methodologies,” Bulletin of Kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 15, pp. 12–19, 2022, doi: 10.20608/00001150.
M. Yukihiro, Clinical Reasoning Required for Clinical Judgment for Nursing Students. vexon international, 2023.
O. Tomoko, Introduction to Clinical Reasoning for Confident Assessment (Japanese). Medicus Shuppan, 2019.
H. Kaya and H. Chifuyu, “Overview of the Definition of ‘Clinical Reasoning’ in Nursing (Japanese),” Bulletin of Kobe City College of Nursing, vol. 25, pp. 1–7, 2021.
K. Takamatsu, K. Murakami, T. Kirimura, K. Bannaka, I. Noda, L. R. J. Wei, K. Mitsunari, M. Seki, E. Matsumoto, M. Bohgaki, A. Imanishi, M. Omori, R. Adachi, M. Yamasaki, H. Sakamoto, K. Takao, J. Asahi, T. Nakamura, et al., “‘Eduinformatics’: A new education field promotion,” Bulletin of kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 11, pp. 27–44, 2018, doi: 10.20608/00000958.
K. Takamatsu, Y. Kozaki, K. Murakami, A. Sugiura, K. Bannaka, K. Mitsunari, M. Omori, and Y. Nakata, “Review of Recent Eduinformatics Research,” in 2019 IIAI International Congress on Applied Information Technology (IIAI-AIT), 2019, p. submitted.
K. Takamatsu, I. Noda, B. Kenya, T. Nakagawa, Y. Kozaki, K. Mitsunari, M. Omori, R. Adachi, and Y. Nakata, “A New Concept of ICT on Eduinformatics in Higher Education,” in Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology: ICICT 2021, London, Volume 1 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems Book 235), Springer Nature, 2022, pp. 693–700. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-2377-6_64.
Y. Yuji, Abduction: Logic of Hypothesis and Discovery (Japanese). Keiso Shobo, 2007.
K. Takamatsu, I. Noda, K. Bannaka, K. Murakami, Y. Kozaki, A. Kishida, H. Kabutoya, K. Mitsunari, R. Adachi, M. Omori, and Y. Nakata, “A new Concept of Digital transformation (DX), and Institutional Research (IR), and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) based on Eduinformatics in Higher Education,” in 7th International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, 2022, p. submitted.
Integrated Innovation Strategy Promotion Council Decision, “AI Strategy 2019,” 2019. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/ai/aistratagy2019en.pdf (accessed Nov. 01, 2024).
K. Takamatsu, I. Noda, K. Bannaka, K. Murakami, T. Kirimura, T. Kunisaki, R. Kozaki, S. Matsumoto, A. Kishida, H. Ito, A. Ito, S. Imai, K. Mitsunari, M. Omori, M. Mori, and Y. Nakata, “Abduction, Abstract Degree and Urgency Matrix (ABDU-M) for Flexible/Agile Higher Education Reform based on Eduinformatics,” in Intelligent Sustainable Systems Selected Papers of WorldS4 2023, 2024, p. in press.
B. Karlsen, T. M. Hillestad, and E. Dysvik, “Abductive reasoning in nursing: Challenges and possibilities,” Nurs. Inq., vol. 28, no. 1, p. e12374, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1111/nin.12374.
M. Lipscomb, “Abductive reasoning and qualitative research: Abductive Reasoning,” Nurs. Philos., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 244–256, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769x.2011.00532.x.
N. A. Mirza, N. Akhtar-Danesh, C. Noesgaard, L. Martin, and E. Staples, “A concept analysis of abductive reasoning,” J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1980–1994, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1111/jan.12379.
Y. Nakata, K. Bannaka, T. Kunisaki, T. Kirimura, and K. Takamatsu, “Abduction essential for mathematical and data science education in basic nursing education: to avoid a belief conflict between methodologies,” Bulletin of Kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 16, pp. 52–59, 2023.
K. Eriksson and U. A. Lindström, “Abduction a way to deeper understanding of the world of caring,” Scand. J. Caring Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 195–198, 1997, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.1997.tb00455.x.
M.-B. Råholm, “Abductive reasoning and the formation of scientific knowledge within nursing research: Abductive Reasoning Within Nursing Research,” Nurs. Philos., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 260–270, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00457.x.
T. Kirimura, K. Takamatsu, K. Bannaka, I. Noda, M. Omori, R. Adachi, K. Mitsunari, and Y. Nakata, “Three-step knowledge network model,” Bulletin of Kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 9, pp. 78–86, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1050845762577181568
K. Takamatsu, K. Bannaka, T. Kirimura, I. Noda, K. Murakami, K. Mitsunari, and Y. Nakata, “Tag-based knowledge network models,” Bulletin of Kobe Tokiwa University, vol. 10, pp. 51–60, 2017.
N. Senka, “What is Clinical Reasoning (Japanese),” 2018. https://knowledge.nurse-senka.jp/226658/ (accessed 20241101).
