Designing Behavioral Indicators for Assessing Learning Outcomes Based on Diploma Policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52731/lir.v005.446

Keywords:

Diploma Policy (DP), Assessment of Learning Outcomes, Behavioral Indicators, Institutional Research (IR)

Abstract

In higher education, assessing learning outcomes based on diploma policy (DP) is essential for ensuring educational quality. However, in Japan, such assessments often rely on subjective self-evaluation, which is prone to bias, contextual effects, and gaps between perception and actual behavior.  This study proposes a method to visualize and deconstruct the abstract language of Diploma Policy (DP) statements using the principles of ontology engineering, followed by the development of concrete behavioral indicators through expert discussion. The target DP, defined by the former Tokyo Institute of Technology, spans the bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral programs. A total of 24 behavioral indicators were developed across six domains: specialist skills, liberal arts (1 and 2), communication skills, and applied skills (inquiry/problem setting and practice/problem solving). These indicators visualize student competencies based on the frequency of observed behaviors, as an alternative or complement to self-perception. The framework is applicable not only at graduation but also during a program, allowing timely feedback for educational improvement and student support. This study presented a novel approach for evaluating DP achievement in a more objective and multidimensional manner. It also holds potential as a complementary framework for designing behavioral indicators and surveys in educational systems that already use outcome-based assessments.

References

Subcommittee on Universities, Central Council for Education, “Guidelines for ac-ademic management,” [in Japanese], 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo0/toushin/1411360_00001.html [Accessed: Apr. 28, 2025].

Subcommittee on Universities, Central Council for Education, “Supplement to the guidelines for academic management,” [in Japanese], 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20230228-mxt_daigakuc01-000004749_1.pdf [Accessed: Apr. 28, 2025].

S. Matsumoto, K. Takamatsu, S. Imai, T. Inakura, and M. Mori, “Survey of current methods for assessing the achievement of diploma policy,” [in Japanese], Proc. 13th Meeting on Japanese Institutional Research, pp. 133–139, 2024. https://doi.org/10.50956/mjir.13.0_133_1.

OECD, Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) Feasibility Study Report, 2013.

R. J. Shavelson, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, and J. W. Caudill, International Per-formance Assessment of Learning in Higher Education (iPAL). Springer, 2018.

European Commission, The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF), 2008.

Malaysian Qualifications Agency, Malaysian Qualifications Framework (2nd ed.), 2017.

Education Bureau, HKSAR, Introduction to the Hong Kong Qualifications Framework (HKQF), 2008.

ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN Qualifications Reference Framework, 2015.

G. T. L. Brown, H. L. Andrade, and F. Chen, “Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 444–457, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523.

L. Jamain, A.-L. de Place, T. Bouffard, and P. Pansu, “Students’ self-evaluation bias of school competence and its link to teacher judgment in elementary school,” Social Psychology of Education, vol. 24, pp. 919–938, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09638-7.

J. Kruger and D. Dunning, “Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1121–1134, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.

T. Gruber, “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199–220, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008.

Tokyo Institute of Technology, “Degree policy,” [Online]. Available: https://www.titech.ac.jp/english/0/about/policies/education [Accessed: Apr. 30, 2025].

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30