Outcomes of Interdisciplinary Graduate Education
A Case Study from a Japanese University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52731/lir.v006.481Keywords:
Interdisciplinary, graduate education, qualitative, quantitative text analysis, JapanAbstract
Interdisciplinary graduate education has become increasingly important in addressing complex global challenges that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries. This study examines the outcomes of such education programs through the lens of Tomlinson’s Graduate Capital Model, which encompasses human, social, cultural, identity, and psychological capitals. Focusing on a case study at a Japanese national university, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews and free-form questionnaire with program graduates. Using KH Coder for quantitative text analysis, the results revealed that interdisciplinary education strengthens graduates’ academic, social, and personal development. It broadens knowledge and skills by combining ideas and methods from different fields, improving research ability, employability, and adaptability. Collaborative learning across disciplines helps students build professional networks and appreciate diverse academic and workplace cultures. These experiences also shape their professional identity, foster career flexibility, and build confidence and resilience. Overall, interdisciplinary learning fosters well-rounded development by cultivating both expertise and transferable skills essential for lifelong learning and success.
References
Harvard University, General Education in a Free Society, Harvard Univ. Press, 1945. https://archive.org/details/generaleducation032440mbp
E. Jantsch, “Inter- and Transdisciplinary University: A Systems Approach to Edu-cation and Innovation,” Higher Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–37, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145222
A. Wilson, Knowledge Power: Interdisciplinary Education for a Complex World, Routledge, 2010.
OECD, The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030 – Learning Compass 2030, 2018. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/tools/oecd-learning-compass-2030.html
UNESCO, Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Educa-tion, UNESCO, 2021.https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en
I. Boor, D. Gerritsen, L. de Greef, and J. Rodermans, Meaningful Assessment in Interdisciplinary Education: A Practical Handbook for University Teachers, Am-sterdam Univ. Press, 2021.
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, P. Scott, S. Schwartzman, and H. Nowotny, The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage Publications, Inc.1994.
G. H. Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, and E. Zemp, Eds., Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dor-drecht: Springer, 2008.
J. T. Klein, Beyond Interdisciplinarity: Boundary Work, Communication, and Col-laboration, Oxford Univ. Press, 2021.
University Council, The Flexibility of the Graduate School System, MEXT, 1988.
University Council, Quantitative Expansion of Graduate Schools, MEXT, 1991.
Central Council for Education, Graduate Education for a New Era, MEXT, 2005.
Central Council for Education, Graduate Education in a Globalized Society, MEXT, 2011.
MEXT, Policy Guidelines for the Promotion of Graduate School Education, MEXT, 2006.
MEXT, Program for Leading Graduate Schools, 2019.
MEXT, Doctoral Program for World-Leading Innovative & Smart Education, 2019.
M. Tomlinson, “Forms of graduate capital and their relationship to graduate em-ployability,” Education + Training, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 338–352, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2016-0090
