Progressive Prediction of Students’ Future Performance on Coherent Vertical Curriculum

Authors

  • Satrio Adi Priyambada Kumamoto University
  • Fatharani Wafda Kumamoto University
  • Tsuyoshi Usagawa Kumamoto University
  • Mahendrawathi ER Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52731/lir.v001.005

Keywords:

educational data mining, ensemble learning, learning behavior, students’ performance

Abstract

Predicting students’ future performance is important for academic stakeholders as the students’ success is the objective of the higher educational institutes. The prediction based on past performance and alignment with the curriculum is crucial to support decision-making action effectively for the university with a coherent vertical curriculum. The result of the prediction can be used to intervene and ensure that the student can graduate on time, also preventing the student from dropping out. In this paper, we proposed a methodology for predicting progressively the students’ future assessment including feature engineering. Using the ensemble learning techniques, we adapt the existing Ensemble-based Progressive Prediction so it can be applied on students’ data that used the Coherent Vertical Curriculum. In this paper, the behavioral data is used instead of domain knowledge-based data. The results show that the algorithm’s accuracy has been improved on a real-world student dataset.

References

R. S. J. d. Baker and K. Yacef, “The State of Educational Data Mining in 2009: A Review and Future Visions,” J. Educ. Data Min., vol. 1, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 3–17, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3554657.

N. Třcka and M. Pechenizkiy, “From local patterns to global models: Towards domain driven educational process mining,” ISDA 2009 - 9th Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Des. Appl., pp. 1114–1119, 2009, doi: 10.1109/ISDA.2009.159.

M. Pechenizkiy, N. Trcka, P. De Bra, and P. Toledo, “CurriM : Curriculum Mining,” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Educ. Data Min., no. i, pp. 1–4, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://educationaldatamining.org/EDM2012/uploads/procs/Posters/edm2012_poster_11.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.win.tue.nl/~mpechen/projects/edm/CurriM_extract.pdf.

National Research Council, Systems for State Science Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.

S. A. Priyambada, M. Er, and B. N. Yahya, “Curriculum Assessment of Higher Educational Institution using Segmented-trace Clustering,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2018, doi: 10.9744/jti.20.1.33-48.

S. A. Priyambada, M. Er, B. N. Yahya, and T. Usagawa, “Profile-Based Cluster Evolution Analysis: Identification of Migration Patterns for Understanding Student Learning Behavior,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 101718–101728, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3095958.

J. Xu, Y. Han, D. Marcu, and M. Van Der Schaar, “Progressive prediction of student performance in college programs,” 31st AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. AAAI 2017, pp. 1604–1610, 2017.

A. J. Fernández-García, R. Rodríguez-Echeverría, J. C. Preciado, J. M. Conejero Manzano, and F. Sánchez-Figueroa, “Creating a recommender system to support higher education students in the subject enrollment decision,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 189069–189088, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031572.

Y. Nieto, V. Gacia-Diaz, C. Montenegro, C. C. Gonzalez, and R. Gonzalez Crespo, “Usage of Machine Learning for Strategic Decision Making at Higher Educational Institutions,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 75007–75017, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919343.

S. A. Priyambada, M. Er, and B. N. Yahya, “Curriculum Assessment of Higher Educational Institution Using Aggregate Profile Clustering,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 124, no. 00, pp. 264–273, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.155.

A. A. Mubarak, H. Cao, and I. M. Hezam, “Deep analytic model for student dropout prediction in massive open online courses,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 93, no. September 2020, p. 107271, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107271.

H. Pallathadka, A. Wenda, E. Ramirez-Asís, M. Asís-López, J. Flores-Albornoz, and K. Phasinam, “Classification and prediction of student performance data using various machine learning algorithms,” Mater. Today Proc., no. xxxx, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.382.

X. Lu, Y. Zhu, Y. Xu, and J. Yu, “Learning from multiple dynamic graphs of student and course interactions for student grade predictions,” Neurocomputing, vol. 431, pp. 23–33, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.023.

H. Zeineddine, U. Braendle, and A. Farah, “Enhancing prediction of student success: Automated machine learning approach,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 89, no. April 2020, p. 106903, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106903.

J. Kuzilek, Z. Zdrahal, and V. Fuglik, “Student success prediction using student exam behaviour,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 125, pp. 661–671, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.07.009.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-25