Next Normal Teaching and Learning: Perceptions and Readiness of Pre-Service Teachers to Promote Critical and Creative Thinking

Authors

  • Pornpisut Duangngern Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University
  • Parama Kwangmuang Department of Innovation, Technology and Learning Science. Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University
  • Lan Thi Nguyen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52731/lir.v003.094

Keywords:

Critical and Creative Thinking, Pre-service Teachers, Perceptions, Readiness

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how pre-service teachers enrolling in Bachelor of Education programs perceived and were prepared for critical and creative thinking, as well as the use of technology based on student ability. The research data set was obtained from self-assessment questionnaire regarding how pre-service teachers perceived critical and creative thinking and the readiness of technology usability. The descriptive statistics from an online survey show that all respondents’ level of readiness for teaching critical and creative thinking is at Level 2 and the pre-service teachers tend to integrate a variety of technologies into classroom. It was inferred that the pre-service teachers had challenges in using digital tools as a teaching and learning tool in the classroom. Notwithstanding these challenges, pre-service teacher professional development programs should promote stronger curricula that address critical and critical thinking as well as the integration of technology to enable pre-service teachers to become a powerful agent for promoting change in the classroom.

 

Author Biographies

Parama Kwangmuang, Department of Innovation, Technology and Learning Science. Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University

 

 

Lan Thi Nguyen

 

 

References

Ramirez IAL. Teaching Preparedness of Pre-Service Teachers: Perception to Practice. Inter

national Journal of Studies in Education and Science [cited 2023 Jan 12].. 2020;1(1):15–35;

https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.6.

Warren JM, Robinson GG. A Consensual Inquiry of Teachers’ Responses to Classroom Situ

ations: Implications for School Counselors. Journal of Educational Research and Prac-tice.

Feb 13;8(1).

Esteban-Guitart M, Monreal-Bosch P, Palma M, González-Ceballos I. Sustaining Stu-dents’

Identities within the Context of Participatory Culture. Designing, Implementing and Evalua

tion an Interactive Learning Activity. Sustainability. 2020 Jun 15;12(12):4870.

Bamrungsin P, Khampirat B. Improving Professional Skills of Pre-Service Teachers Using

Online Training: Applying Work-Integrated Learning Approaches through a Quasi-

Experimental Study. Sustainability. 2022 Apr 6;14(7):4362.

Dummett P, Hughes J. Critical thinking in ELT: a working model for the classroom. Boston,

Ma: Cengage Learning, Inc; 2019.

OECD. PISA 2018 Results. Vol. 1, PISA. OECD; 2019.

Schwab K, Zahidi S. The Future of Jobs Report 2020 [Internet]. World Economic Forum.

Oct. Available from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf

The Critical Thinking Global Report | Gunung.org [Internet]. 2020. Available from:

https://www.gunung.org/critical-thinking-global-report/.

Straková Z. The perception of readiness for teaching profession: a case of pre-service trainees.

Journal of Language and Cultural Education. 2015 Jan 1;3(1):32–42.

Hoy AW, Spero RB. Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A com

parison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2005 May;21(4):343–56.

Alfaiz A, Rafiola RH, Hariko R, Zulfikar Z. Condition and Shaping of Student Per-sonality

in Educational Process Through Transpersonal Psychology Perspective [cited 2023 Apr 9].

p. 1–4. Available from: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icet-17/25883491.

Agustin RR, Liliasari L. Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers (PSTs)’ Techno-logical

Pedagogical Content Knowledge Through Extended Content Representation (CoRe).

Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017 Feb; 812:012103.

Watson JH, Rockinson-Szapkiw A. Predicting preservice teachers’ intention to use technol

ogy-enabled learning. Computers & Education. 2021 Jul; 168:104207.

Howe ER, Watson GC. Finding Our Way Through a Pandemic: Teaching in Alternate Modes

of Delivery. Frontiers in Education. 2021 May 24;6.

Turnbull, D., Chugh, R. & Luck, J. Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pan

demic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge?. Educ Inf Tech

nol 26, 6401–6419 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w.

Zhang Y. The Effect of on Educational Technology on EFL Learners’ Self-Efficacy. Frontiers

in Psychology. 2022 Apr 13;13.

Glantz E, Gamrat C, Lenze L, Bardzell J. Improved Student Engagement in Higher Educa

tion’s Next Normal. er.educause.edu. 2021. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/arti

cles/2021/3/improved-student-engagement-in-higher-educations-next-normal.

Bozkurt A, Sharma RC. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Coro

naVirus pandemic. AsianJDE [Internet]. 2020Apr.30 [cited 2023Apr.11];15(1):i-vi. Availa

ble from: https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/447.

Becky Green. Shifting From Lessons to Learning Experiences: Designing for Deeper Learn

ing [Internet]. GOA. [cited 2023 Apr 2]. Available from: https://globalonlineacademy.org/in

sights/articles/shifting-from-lessons-to-learning-experiences-designing-for-deeper-learning.

Hoi VN. Online Learning Environments and Student Engagement: Meeting the Psy-cholog

ical Needs of Learners during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Global Perspectives on Ed-ucational

Innovations for Emergency Situations. 2022;253–63.

Pérez-Gracia E, Serrano-Rodríguez R, Pontes-Pedrajas A. Building EFL Preservice Teach

ers’ Professional Identity: Does Gender Matter? Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Profes-sional De

velopment. 2022 Jul 27;24(2):117–31.

Vincent-Lancrin S, González-Sancho C, Bouckaert M, de Luca F, Fernández-Barrerra M,

Jacotin G, et al. Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking: What it means in school.

OECD; 2019.

Australian Curriculum and Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2020b). The

Critical and Creative Thinking Learning Continuum. [cited 2023 Jan 15]; from

https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/media/1072/generalcapabilities-creative-and-crit

ical-thinking-learning-continuum.pdf.

Nussbaum, M., Barahona, C., Rodriguez, F. et al. Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit

online. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 201–206 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-

-09867-1.

Paul R. Critical Thinking. Sonoma State University, Center for Critical Thinking & Moral

Critique; 1993.

Paul R, Elder L, Amazon.com (Firm. Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your pro

fessional and personal life. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education; 2002.

Kuan C, Tsai. Being a Critical and Creative Thinker: A Balanced Thinking Mode. Asian

Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (AJHSS). 2013 [cited 2023 Jan 19];1(2). Avail

able from: http://ajhss.org/pdfs-1/Being%20a%20Critical%20and%20Crea

tive%20Thinker.....pdf.

Kasirer A, Shnitzer-Meirovich S. The perception of creativity and creative abilities among

general education and special education teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2021

Mar;100820; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100820.

Chadwick C. A Conceptual Model for Teaching Critical Thinking in a Knowledge Economy.

Educational Technology [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Feb 11];51(3):37–42. Available from:

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ936515.

Kuan Chen Tsai. REATIVE TEACHING AND TEACHING EXCELLENCE [Inter

net]. 2013 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: http://www.kiecon.org/Creativ ity%20

Book%202013%20KUAN%20TSAI.pdf.

Andrew Gurevich. Week 2 - Creative and Critical Thinking [Internet]. Humanities

LibreTexts. 2021. Available from: https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Composi

tion/Advanced_Composition/Book%3A_Critical_Thinking_(Gurevich)/01%3A_Chap

ters/1.02%3A_Week_2_-_Creative_and_Critical_Thinking.

Smart KL, Cappel JJ. Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Jour

nal of Information Technology Education: Research [Internet]. 2006 Jan 1;5(1):201–19.

Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111541/.

Mark Mishiwo. Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of College Tutors’ Use of Stu-dent-Cen

tred Approach of Teaching and Learning Mathematics. British Journal of Education. 2022

Mar 15;10(3):115–25.

Martin F, Hunt B, Wang C, Brooks E. Middle School Student Perception of Technology Use

and Digital Citizenship Practices. Computers in the Schools. 2020 Aug 4;37(3):1–20.

Linjawi AI, Alfadda LS. Students' perception, attitudes, and readiness toward online learning

in dental education in Saudi Arabia: a cohort study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Nov

;9:855-863. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S175395. PMID: 30538597; PMCID: PMC6254499.

Utkarsh Shukla. Perceptual Readiness Meaning And Significance [Internet]. www.tutori

alspoint.com. [cited 2023 Apr 7]. Available from: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/percep

tual-readiness-meaning-and-significance.

Polly D. Modeling the Influence of Calculator Use and Teacher Effects on First Grade Stu

dents’ Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science

Teaching [Internet]. 2008 Jul 1 [cited 2023 Apr 3];27(3):245–63. Available from:

https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24459/.

Barton R, Haydn T. Trainee teachers’ views on what helps them to use information and

communication technology effectively in their subject teaching. Journal of Computer As

sisted Learning. 2006 Jul 5;22(4):257–72.

Ismail Elmahdi and Hala Fawzi. Pre-service Teachers’ Perception of Readiness to Teach in

Light of Teachers’ Standards. American Journal of Educational Research. 2019; 7(4):304-

; doi: 10.12691/education-7-4-1.

Ramirez, I. A. L. Teaching preparedness of pre-service teachers: Perception to practice. In

ternational Journal of Studies in Education and Science (IJSES). 2020; 1(1), 15-35;

doi: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.

Wiersma W, Internet Archive. Research methods in education: an introduction [Inter-net].

Internet Archive. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1995 [cited 2023 April 20]. Available from:

https://archive.org/details/researchmethodsi06edwier.

Rahayu RP, Wirza Y. Teachers’ Perception of Online Learning during Pandemic Covid-19.

Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. 2020 Dec 31;20(3):392–406; https://doi.org/10.17509/

jpp.v20i3.29226.

Namsaeng P. Thai EFL Trainee Teachers’ Perceptions on Teacher Training. gshskku [Inter

net]. 2022 Jun. 26 [cited 2023 Apr. 7];11(1):202-27. Available from: https://so03.tci-

thaijo.org/index.php/gshskku/article/view/257942.

Bernard Wiafe Akaadom (PhD). " Pre-service teachers’ technology skills and its effects in

using technology for instruction: In pursuit for quality teacher training." International Jour

nal of Engineering and Science, vol. 10, no. 09, 2020, pp. 18-28.

Bornschlegl, Caltabiano Bornschlegl, Madeleine, and Nerina Jane Caltabiano. “In-creasing

Accessibility to Academic Support in Higher Education for Diverse Student Cohorts.”

Teaching & Learning Inquiry. 2020; https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.13.

Chen RJ. Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-

centered learning. Computers & Education. 2010 Aug;55(1):32–42; https://doi.org/10.1016

/j.compedu.2009.11.015.

Christina Wekerle & Ingo Kollar. Using technology to promote student learning? An

analysis of pre- and in-service teachers’ lesson plans, Technology, Pedagogy and Education,

:5, 597-614, DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2022.2083669.

Levanon M. “The possibility to be creative is the reason I want to teach”: Pre-service teach

ers’ perceptions of creative teaching and philosophical education. Social Sciences & Hu

manities Open. 2021;4(1):100190.

Valli P, Perkkilä P, Valli R. Adult Pre-Service Teachers Applying 21st Century Skills in the

Practice. ATHENS JOURNAL OF EDUCATION. 2014 Apr 30;1(2):115–30.

Champa RA, Rochsantiningsih D, Kristiana D. Teachers’ Readiness Indicators on ICT Inte

gration into their Teaching. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and

Education (BirLE) Journal. 2019 Nov 5;2(4):195–203.

Lamb, T. E. (2011). Fragile identities: Exploring learner identity, learner autonomy and mo

tivation through young learners’ voices. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Spe

cial Issue, 14(2): 68−85; https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19858.

Kolb A, Kolb D. Experiential Learning Theory as a Guide for Experiential Educators in

Higher Education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education [Internet]. 2017

Jun 1;1(1):7–44. Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/elthe/vol1/iss1/7.

Alelaimat AM, Ihmeideh FM, Alkhawaldeh MF. Preparing Preservice Teachers for Technol

ogy and Digital Media Integration: Implications for Early Childhood Teacher Education Pro

grams. International Journal of Early Childhood. 2020 Dec;52(3):299–317.

Acarapol Chaiyachok. Creative Use of Technology to Foster Young Children in the 21st

Century [Internet]. Chula Digital Collections. 2019 [cited 2023 Jan 12]. Available from:

https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/educujournal/vol47/iss4/27/.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-30