The Study of the Needs of Developing Design Thinking to Promote Learning Activities in Teaching Physical Education and Health Education for Pre-service Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52731/lir.v003.096Keywords:
Design thinking, Pre-service teachers of Physical Education and Health Education, needsAbstract
Design thinking is an important and necessary process to develop pre-service teachers, especially majoring in physical education and health education. It assists them in improving their learning design, creating innovations that promote knowledge and designing services that enhance innovation in physical education and health education in the community. Therefore, the objectives of this study are to investigate the needs of developing design thinking that boosts the organization of learning activities in physical education and health education of 364 pre-service teachers at Faculty of Education of 11 northeastern Rajabhat Universities, Thailand. The research tools consist of a questionnaire of the necessity of design thinking, including five levels of options indicating current conditions and five levels of expected needs. In addition, statistics used for the data analysis is mean, standard deviation and the index value of the importance of the needs. The results of the study showed that in Aspect 1 (Empathize), the overall needs index is at the level of 0.80, the current condition at (M = 2.30, S.D. = 0.90), and the expected needs at (M = 2.30, S.D. = 0.90). For the Aspect 2 (Define), the overall needs index is at the level of 0.72, the current condition at (M =2.41, S.D.= 0.93) and the expected needs at (M =4.15, S.D.=0.77). In addition, for the Aspect 3 (Ideate), the overall needs level is at 0.66, the current condition at (M = 2.50, S.D.=0.93) and the expected needs at (M = 4.14, S.D.=0.77). Moreover, in the Aspect 4 (Prototype), the overall needs index is at 0.66, the current condition at (M =2.49, S.D.=0.94) and the expected need at (M =4.13, S.D.=0.79). Finally, in the Aspect 5 (Test), the overall needs index is at 0.61, current condition at (M =2.56, S.D.=0.94) and expected needs at (M =4.13, S.D.=0.80).
References
OECD. Trends Shaping Education 2019. OECD; 2019.
National Strategy 2018-2037(Summary) [Internet]. Coj.go.th. [cited 2023 Apr 2]. Availa
ble from: https://oia.coj.go.th/th/content/category/detail/id/8/cid/5885/iid/93993.
Phothong W. TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHERS' LIFELONG LEARNING. Journal of
Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences) [Internet]. 2018
[cited 2023 Apr 5];11(2):18–26. Available from: https://www.journal.nu.ac.th/JCDR/ar
ticle/view/1881.
Matsumoto-Royo K, Ramírez-Montoya MS. Core practices in practice-based teacher ed
ucation: A systematic literature review of its teaching and assessment process. Stud
Educ Eval. 2021;70(101047):101047. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
stueduc.2021.101047.
Johansson-Sköldberg U, Woodilla J, Çetinkaya M. Design thinking: Past, present and
possible futures. Creat Innov Manag. 2013;22(2):121–46. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023.
Brown T. CHANGE BY DESIGN: how design thinking transforms organizations and
inspires innovation. Harper Business; 2009.
OECD. OECD Skills Outlook 2019 Thriving in a Digital World. OECD Publishing; 2019.
Brown T. Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev. 2008 Jun;86(6):84-92, 141. PMID: 18605031.
Brenner JS. Sports Specialization and Intensive Training in Young Athletes. PEDIAT
RICS. 2016 Aug 29;138(3):e20162148–8.
Panke S. Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges.
Open Education Studies. 2019 Jan 1;1(1):281–306.
Chambers FC. Redesigning the Pedagogies of Physical Literacy: Using Design Thinking
as an innovation approach. Ejournal de la recherche sur l’intervention en éducation phy
sique et sport –eJRIEPS. 2021 Jun 10;(Hors-série N° 4).
Goligorsky, D. (8 December 2012) “Empathy and Innovation: The IDEO Approach,”
Lecture, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
Chambers FC, Aldous D, Bryant A. Threshold concepts in physical education: a design
thinking approach. London: Routledge; 2021.
Kleinsmann, M., Valkenburg, R., & Sluijs, J. Capturing the Value of Design Thinking
in Different Innovation Practices. International Journal of Design [Online]. 2017 Aug
11:2. Available: http://ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2771/780.
Serrat O. Design Thinking. Knowledge Solutions. 2017;129–34.
David Kelley. IDEO on 60 Minutes and CBS This Morning [Internet]. www.ideo.com.
[cited 2023 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.ideo.com/post/ideo-on-60-minutes-
and-cbs-this- Morning.
Falk Uebernickel, Brenner W. Design thinking for innovation: research and practice.
Cham: Springer Verlag; 2016.
Falk Uebernickel, Li Jun Jiang, Brenner W, Pukall B, Naef T, Bernhard Schindlholzer.
Design Thinking. 2020 Jan 18;
Brenner W, Uebernickel F, Abrell T. Design Thinking as Mindset, Process, and Toolbox.
Design Thinking for Innovation [Internet]. 2016;3–21. Available from:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3_1.
Cochrane T, Munn J. EDR and Design Thinking: Enabling Creative Pedagogies [Inter
net]. www.learntechlib.org. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Educa
tion (AACE);2016 [cited 2023 Apr 8]. p. 315–24. Available from: https://www.learnte
chlib.org/primary/p/172969.
Ideo (Firm. Design thinking for educators. Designer’s workbook. Palo Alto, Ca; Chi
cago: IdeoLlc; 2012.
Müller-RoterbergC. Handbook of Design Thinking Tipps & Tools for how to design
thinking. Middletown, De [Verlag Nicht Ermittelbar; 2018.
Nash JB. Design thinking in schools: a leader’s guide to collaborating for improvement.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press; 2019.
Chaney EH, Chavarria E, Stellefson ML, Birch DA, Spear C. American Association for
Health Education (AAHE) 2011 Membership Survey. American Journal of Health Edu
cation. 2012 Nov;43(6):322–6.
The Ministry of Education. The Basic Education Core Curriculum. The Ministry of
Education Thailand Contents [Internet]. Available from: http://academic.obec.go.th/im
ages/document/1525235513_d_1.pdf.
McLennan, Nancy. Making the case for inclusive quality physical education policy
development: a policy brief [Internet]. Unesdoc.unesco.org. UNESCO; [cited
Apr12]. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375422.
Miller J, Wilson-Gahan S, Garrett R, Haynes J. Health and Physical Education. Cam
bridge University Press; 2022.
Morton KL, Atkin AJ, Corder K, Suhrcke M, van Sluijs EMF. The school environment
and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a mixed-studies systematic
review. Obesity Reviews. 2015 Dec 18;17(2):142–58.
Georgiadis E. Design Thinking Applications in Physical Activity and Exercise Literacy
[Internet]. Contemporary Advances in Sports Science. IntechOpen; 2021. Available
from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97479.
Altman M, Huang TTK, Breland JY. Design Thinking in Health Care. Prev Chronic Dis.
Jan 27; 15:180128.
Taro Yamane. Statistics; an introductory analysis. New York: Harper & Row; 1974.
Rovinelli, R.J. and Hambleton, R.K. On the use of content specialists in the assessment
of criterion-referenced test item validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Educational Research Association: California. April 19 –23, 1976) [Online]
Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fultlext/ED121845.pdf.Retrieved Feb 3, 2022.
Shotiga Phasipol, Nuttaporn Lawthong, Kamonwan Tangdhanakanond. Learning Meas
urement and Evaluation, Bangkok: Educational Research and Psychology; 2015.
Nonglak Wiratchai and Suwimon Wongwanich. Synthesis of educational research by
Meta-analysis and content analysis [Internet]. KU Knowledge Repository. 1999 [cited
Feb 23]. Available from: https://kukrdb.lib.ku.ac.th/proceedings/kucon/search_
detail/result/7397.
Witkin BR, Altschuld JW. Planning and conducting needs assessments: A practical guide.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1995.
Damrimungkit A, Kijkuakul S. MENTOR TEACHERS’ AND PRE-SERVICE TEACH
ERS VIEW ON SCIENCE TEACHING IN THE 21st CENTURY. JFEPRU [Internet].
[cited 2023 Apr 23];8(2):228–39. Available from: https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/in
dex.php/edupsru /article/view/247316.
Pickett J. Threshold concepts in physical education: a design thinking approach: Edited
by Fiona C. Chambers, David Aldous and Anna Bryant, London, Routledge, 2021, 213
pp.$160 (hardback), ISBN 978-0-367-35845-7. Sport Educ Soc [Internet].
;26(9):1041–3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.
Lee H, Chang C, Chung C. Research on Design Thinking and TPACK of Physical
Education Pre-service Teachers [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 13]. Available from:
https://icce2021.apsce.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ICCE2021-Vol.II-PP.-9-16.pdf
Garrett T. Student-centered and teacher-centered classroom management: A case study
of three elementary teachers [Internet]. Eric.ed.gov. 2008 [cited 2023 Apr 23]. Available
from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ829018.pdf.
Stolz SA, Kirk D. David Kirk on physical education and sport pedagogy: in dialogue
with Steven Stolz (part 1). Asia-Pac J Health Sport Phys Educ [Internet]. 2015;6(1):77–
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2014.997862.
Institute Of Medicine, Kohl HW, Cook HD, Institute Of Medicine (U.S.) Committee On
Physical Activity And Physical Education, The I, Institute Of Medicine (U.S.). Food And
Nutrition Board. Educating the student body: taking physical activity and physical
education to school. Washington, Dc: The National Academies Press; 2013.
Koonkaew A. The study of characteristics of Thai teachers in the 21st century. GTHJ
[Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 13];26(4):43–55. Available from: https://so05.tci-
thaijo.org/index.php/tgt/article/view/248137.
